Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 15 (0.28 seconds)Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 162 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
State Of U.P vs P.A. Madhu on 17 July, 1984
iii) State of Uttar Pradesh vs. P.A. Madhu, reported in 1984 AIR
(SC) 1523,
Dhanapal & Ors vs State By Public Prosecutor, Madras on 1 September, 2009
Learned counsel for the respondents-accused Nos. 1 and 3 in
criminal appeal No. 46 of 2014, in order to substantiate his
submissions placed reliance on the judgment in the case of
Dhanapal vs. State by Public Prosecutor, Madras, reported in (2009)
10 SCC 401.
Ashraf Hussain Shah vs State Of Maharashtra on 26 March, 1996
31. Learned counsel for the accused persons have placed
reliance on the judgment of this Court in the case of Ashraf Hussain
Shah vs. State of Maharashtra, reported in 1996 Cri.L.J. 3147. In
the said case, the Division Bench of this court has considered the
delay in lodging the complaint as fatal to the prosecution case for the
reason that even though the informants were at the police station for
the hours, did not lodge the F.I.R. In the facts of the said case, this
Court held that their conduct was highly unnatural and improbable
::: Uploaded on - 16/07/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 18/07/2018 01:34:52 :::
crapl367.13
-29-
and was sufficient to hold that they did not see the incident. In the
instance case, P.W.1 Ramhari Shinde after returning from S.R.T.S.
Medical College and Hospital, Ambejogai, immediately lodged the
complaint in the concerned police station and as such there is no
delay in lodging the complaint.
Ganesh Bhavan Patel & Anr vs State Of Maharashtra on 18 October, 1978
iii) Ganesh Bhavan Patil and another vs. State of Maharashtra,
::: Uploaded on - 16/07/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 18/07/2018 01:34:52 :::
crapl367.13
-14-
reported in AIR 1979 SC 135,