Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (3.37 seconds)
Shashi Kumar Saini vs The State on 13 May, 2005 cites

Ramesh Chander & Ors vs Delhi Administration & Ors on 9 August, 1996

3. The learned counsel for the State pointed out that the Additional Sessions Judge had dismissed the appeal filed on behalf of the petitioner against the order dated 13.12.2004 passed by the Juvenile Justice Board declining to release the petitioner on bail. He further submitted that the learned Additional Sessions Judge had examined the case and had also gone through the provisions of Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2000 as well as the decisions in the case of (1) Arvind v. State, 1999 (2) JC (Delhi) 361; (2) Rafiq Ahmed v. The State (NCT of Delhi) 1998(1) JCC (Delhi) 172 as also (3) Ramesh v. State of Delhi 1996 JCC 299.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 22 - Full Document

Arvind Singh vs State Of Bihar on 26 April, 2001

3. The learned counsel for the State pointed out that the Additional Sessions Judge had dismissed the appeal filed on behalf of the petitioner against the order dated 13.12.2004 passed by the Juvenile Justice Board declining to release the petitioner on bail. He further submitted that the learned Additional Sessions Judge had examined the case and had also gone through the provisions of Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2000 as well as the decisions in the case of (1) Arvind v. State, 1999 (2) JC (Delhi) 361; (2) Rafiq Ahmed v. The State (NCT of Delhi) 1998(1) JCC (Delhi) 172 as also (3) Ramesh v. State of Delhi 1996 JCC 299.
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 139 - Full Document
1