Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.20 seconds)

Horticulture Experiment Station ... vs The Regional Provident Fund ... on 23 February, 2022

5.In view of the above principles laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the Hon'ble Full Bench of this Court, the findings of the appellate tribunal that there is no element on the part of the 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 23/09/2025 04:18:23 pm ) WP(MD)No.13168 of 2021 respondent establishment for mens rea or actus reus cannot be a ground to modify the order of the original authority. Therefore, the impugned order is set aside. However, the 2nd respondent is at liberty to pay the balance amount as claimed under Section 14B of the EFP Act, in six equal monthly installments commencing from November 2025.
Supreme Court of India Cites 28 - Cited by 70 - A Rastogi - Full Document

Union Of India & Ors vs M/S. Dharamendra Textile Processors ... on 29 September, 2008

19.Taking note of the three-Judge Bench judgment of this Court in Union of India Vs Dharmendra Textile Processors, which is indeed binding on us, we are of the considered view that any default or delay in the payment of EPF contribution by the employer under the Act is a sine qua non for imposition of levy of damages under Section 14-B of the 1952 Act and mens rea or actus reus is not an essential element for imposing penalty / 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 23/09/2025 04:18:23 pm ) WP(MD)No.13168 of 2021 damages for breach of civil obligations / liabilities.”
Supreme Court of India Cites 44 - Cited by 1355 - A Pasayat - Full Document
1