Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.33 seconds)
Rudrapriyo Ray (Axis Bank) vs Reserve Bank Of India on 10 August, 2022 cites

Reserve Bank Of India vs Jayantilal N. Mistry on 16 December, 2015

23. Further, the Commission has already outlined the deficiency in the conduct of the CPIO/FAA while hearing such matters and hence is of the opinion that due care has to be taken by according opportunity of personal hearing and making Page 9 of 16 reasoned order with reference to the objections in the hands of the CPIO and later in the hands of FAA, if any appeal is preferred. Hence, the CPIO will be required to adjudicate such RTI applications in the light of the observations of the Commission afresh. The Commission also expects that the CPIO will take view on various objections filed by the Appellant and submissions made by applicant to reach the decision in favor or against on case to case basis. He has to factor the observation of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Jayantilal Mistry case, Commission's judgment dated 05.05.2022 and other relevant judgments, some of which have been referred in this order as well. Hence, with these observations the order passed by the CPIO and FAA in these matters is set aside and the case is being remanded to the CPIO for adjudication afresh in line with the Commission full bench decision passed in file nos. CIC/RBIND/A/2021/152460 & Ors. dated 05.05.2022. In case, the appellant/applicant is aggrieved with the order of the CPIO, they are at the liberty to file first appeal before the First Appellate Authority and afterwards second appeal before the Commission.
Supreme Court of India Cites 51 - Cited by 187 - M Y Eqbal - Full Document
1