Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 21 (0.29 seconds)

D.K. Yadav vs J.M.A. Industries Ltd on 7 May, 1993

21. This Court in D.K. Yadav vs. J.M.A Industries Ltd. (1993) 3 SCC 259 has laid down that where the Rule provided that the services of an employee who overstays the leave would be treated to have been automatically terminated, would be bad as violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution. It was further held that if any action was taken on the basic of such a rule without giving any opportunity of hearing to the employees, it would be wholly unjust, arbitrary and unfair. The Court reiterated and emphasised in no uncertain terms that principles of natural justice would have to be read into the provision relating to automatic termination of services.
Supreme Court of India Cites 23 - Cited by 597 - K Ramaswamy - Full Document

Scooters India And Ors. vs Vijai E.V. Eldred on 3 October, 1996

22. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed strong reliance upon a decision of this Court in Civil Appeal No. 3486 of 1992, Scooters India & Ors. vs. Vijay E.V. Eldred, decided on 10.301996, in support of his contention that any stipulation for automatic termination of services made in the Standing Orders could not have been declared to be invalid. We have been referred to a stray sentence in that judgment, which is to the following effect:
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 114 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next