Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.22 seconds)

Sri Krishna Singh vs Mathura Ahir And Ors on 21 December, 1979

5. Having considered the rival submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and perusing the material on record, it is limpid that the petitioner is prevented from enjoying the fruits of the decree passed in R.A.No.77/2001 confirmed in R.S.A.No.2158/2007 even after lapse of 14 years. It is beneficial to refer to the ruling of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of KRISHNA SINGH VS. MATHURA AHIR 2 wherein it has been held that the jurisdiction to stay execution of the decree under Order XXI Rule 29 CPC has to be exercised 2 AIR 1982 SC 686 7 with great care and only in special cases. The power to stay execution of the decree under Order XXI Rule 29 CPC is discretionary. The discretion should be exercised judiciously and not mechanically as a matter of course.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 88 - A P Sen - Full Document

Smt. Sundra Bai And Ors. vs Smt. Sonubai on 25 February, 2004

The cognate bench of this Court in SUNDRA BAI's case supra has held that the fundamental consideration should be that the decree holder is not to be deprived of the fruits of the decree except for good reasons. The decree must be allowed to be executed and unless an extraordinary case is made out, no stay should be granted. Mere satisfaction of the precondition stipulated in Order 21 Rule 29 CPC would not be a ground for the executing court to stay execution of the decree until the pending suit has been decided. The possibility of the judgment debtor filing frivolous suits to stall the execution of the decree would not be ruled out. Stay of execution of decree would 8 not be proper in the facts and circumstances of the case as it would result in deprival of the right accrued to the decree holder to enjoy the fruits of the decree passed in R.A.No.77/2001 confirmed by this Court. For the aforesaid reasons, this Court finds it appropriate to quash the order impugned allowing the writ petition. Hence, the following order:
Karnataka High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 5 - H G Ramesh - Full Document
1