Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.23 seconds)
Rev. Fr. Bernad Thattil vs Ramachandran Pillai on 6 October, 1986 cites

Palaniappa Asary And Ors. vs Emperor on 10 March, 1910

Madhava Reddi, J., in .that case, has followed the dictum in Palaniappa Chettiar v. Emperor 1935 Mad WN 460. In that case the Madras High Court held that Section 126 is not infringed if an advocate who asked a defamatory question on the information of his client, deposes to that effect when his client is sued for defamation, or when his reply notice to that effect is allowed to be produced in Court. These two decisions support the view which I have taken.
Madras High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 10 - Full Document
1