Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 25 (0.22 seconds)
Shyam Sundar Prasad Sinha vs The State Of Bihar on 10 October, 2022 cites

Kuldeep Singh vs The Commissioner Of Police & Ors on 17 December, 1998

23. Further, relying on the Supreme Court's decision in case of Kuldeep Singh v. Commr. of Police, reported in (1999) 2 SCC 10, the Supreme Court, in case of Babu v. State of Kerala, reported in (2010) 9 SCC 189, has held that the finding of fact recorded by a court can be held to be perverse if the findings have been arrived at by ignoring or excluding relevant material or by taking into consideration irrelevant/inadmissible material. The finding may also be said to be perverse if it is "against the weight of evidence", or if the finding so outrageously defies logic as to suffer from the vice of irrationality, the Supreme Court held.
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 420 - Full Document

Babu vs State Of Kerala on 11 August, 2010

23. Further, relying on the Supreme Court's decision in case of Kuldeep Singh v. Commr. of Police, reported in (1999) 2 SCC 10, the Supreme Court, in case of Babu v. State of Kerala, reported in (2010) 9 SCC 189, has held that the finding of fact recorded by a court can be held to be perverse if the findings have been arrived at by ignoring or excluding relevant material or by taking into consideration irrelevant/inadmissible material. The finding may also be said to be perverse if it is "against the weight of evidence", or if the finding so outrageously defies logic as to suffer from the vice of irrationality, the Supreme Court held.
Supreme Court of India Cites 43 - Cited by 492 - B S Chauhan - Full Document

Chandrappa & Ors vs State Of Karnataka on 15 February, 2007

30. Conscious of the principles enunciated by the Supreme Court in various decisions as noted above, particularly the decisions in case of Murugesan (supra) and Chandrappa (supra), we have examined the sustainability of the impugned judgment of the trial court and we have considered the grounds taken in the memo of appeal to assail the same and the submissions advanced on behalf of the appellant. The trial court has duly dealt with the evidence of the prosecution witnesses including that of PW-4 and material contradictions in his deposition and other evidence at the trial has doubted the presence of PW-4 on the place of occurrence. The opinion formed by the trial court cannot be said to be palpably erroneous and suffering from perversity, warranting this Court's interference.
Supreme Court of India Cites 40 - Cited by 2545 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next