Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 43 (0.51 seconds)
Tahir Hussain vs The Collector District Bikaner on 30 January, 2026 cites

Moran Mar Basselios Catholicos And ... vs The Most Rev. Mar Poulose Athanasius And ... on 21 May, 1954

In Moran Mar Basselios Catholicos (supra), [Moran Mar Basselios Catholicos v Most Rev. Mar Poulose Athanasius ((1955) 1 SCR 520 : AIR 1954 SC 526)] the controversy concerned a statement made by the judges of the Full Bench of the High Court of Travancore (per majority of two judges) that the defendants' advocate had conceded that the plaintiffs had not left the Church and they were as good members of the Church as anybody else. It was the case of the defendants (the review petitioners) that this statement was said to be inaccurate, incomplete and misleading.
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 831 - B Jagannadhadas - Full Document

S. Nagaraj And Ors. vs State Of Karnataka And Anr. on 26 August, 1993

The power of review inheres in every Court of plenary jurisdiction to prevent miscarriage of justice or to correct grave and palpable errors committed by it. (Vide Shivdeo Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Punjab & Ors., AIR 1963 SC 1909; Aribam Tuleshwar Sharma Vs. aribam Pishak Sharma & Ors., AIR 1979 SC 1047; Union Carbide Corporation Vs. Union of India & Ors., AIR 1992 SC 248; S. Nagaraj & Ors. (Supra); Parision Devi & Ors Vs. Sumitri Devi & Ors., (1997) 8 SCC 715; Surjit Singh & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors., (1997) 10 SCC 592; Revenue Divisional Officers & Ors Vs. A. Aruna & Ors., (1998) 6 SCC 494; & Rajendra Kumar & Ors. Vs. Rambhal & Ors., AIR 2003 SC 2095).
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 368 - Full Document

The Nalagarh Dehati Co-Operative ... vs Beli Ram Etc. on 29 August, 1980

8. A Full Bench of the Himachal Pradesh High Court, in D. Nalagarh Dehati Co-operative Transport Society Ltd., Nalagarh Vs. Beli Ram, AIR 1981 HP 1, considered the scope of review and held that not considering an existing judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court may be a ground of review and for the same it placed reliance upon the judgments of the Privy Council in Rajah Kotagiri Venkata Subbamma Rao Vs. Rajah Vellanki Venkatrama Rao, (1900) 27 IA 197 (PC), wherein it was held that the purpose of review, inter alia, is to correct an apparent error which should not have been there when the judgment was given.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 44 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 Next