Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.37 seconds)Section 276 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 2 in The Prevention Of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 [Entire Act]
Section 10 in The Prevention Of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 114 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 13 in The Prevention Of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 [Entire Act]
Section 16 in The Prevention Of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 [Entire Act]
State Of Gujarat vs Shantaben Wife Of Bhol Dhulabhai on 6 August, 1963
The material facts stated in the report pertaining to Rules 7 and 18 are that the Public Analyst certified that the sample was properly sealed and fastened, and that he found the seal intact and unbroken. This certificate is given by the Public Analyst under Rule 7(3) after the conditions laid down in Rule 7(1) & (2) are fulfilled. In other words, on receipt of the packet containing the sample for analysis from Food Inspector or any other person, the Public Analyst shall compare the seal on the container and the outer conver with specimen impression received separately and shall note the condition of the seals thereon. Thereafter, under Sub-rule (2) he would make the analysis and then he would send the report in Form No. III. The report in Form No. III is thus preceded by certain ostensible acts which are, (i) comparison as prescribed in Sub-rule (1) and (ii) analysis referred to in Sub-rule (2) of Rule 7 of the Rules. The report of the Public Analyst is thus by itself evidence of fact of the compliance of Rules 7(1) and 18.