Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.22 seconds)Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Tata Cellular vs Union Of India on 26 July, 1994
15. The principles deduced by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Tata Cellular (supra) are:
Asia Foundation & Construction Ltd vs Trafalgar House Construction (I) Ltd. & ... on 17 December, 1996
In Asia Foundation and Construction Ltd. v. Trafalgar House Construction (1) Ltd., (1997) 1 SCC 738, the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that judicial review of contractual transactions of public bodies was permissible to prevent arbitrariness, favouratism and use of power by collateral purposes and further where it would be detrimental in public interest to interfere. The later emphasis is on allowing certain flexibility in administrative decision- making; and a decision can be challenged on the Wednesbury Principle of Unreasonableness, i.e. the decision was so unreasonable that no sensible person would have arrived at it; else, it should not be disturbed; and that if a reasonable procedure had been followed, the decision should not be challenged except on the Wednesbury Principle of Unreasonableness.
West Bengal State Electricity Board vs Patel Engineering Co. Ltd. & Ors on 15 January, 2001
25. The learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in W.B. State Electricity Board v. Patel Engineering Co. Ltd. and Ors., (2001) 2 SCC 451, where it was observed that in cases of tenders, rules and instructions must be complied with scrupulously in order to avoid discrimination, arbitrariness and favouratism, which are contrary to rule of law and unconstitutional values and relaxation by State or its agencies of a rule or condition in favour of a particular bidder was held not permissible unless expressly provided for in the rules.
Article 299 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
1