Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 18 (0.55 seconds)Section 482 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Smt. Nagawwa vs Veeranna Shivallngappa Konjalgi on 23 April, 1976
Some of them are akin to the illustrative examples given in the above referred case of Smt. Nagawwa Vs. Veeranna Shivalingappa Konjalgi 1976 3 SCC 736. The cases where the allegations made against the accused or the evidence collected by the Investigating Officer do not constitute any offence or where the allegations are absurd or extremely improbable impossible to believe or where prosecution is legally barred or where criminal proceeding is malicious and malafide instituted with ulterior motive of grudge and vengeance alone may be the fit cases for the High Court in which the criminal proceedings may be quashed.
State Of U.P. And Another vs Chandra Shekhar Singh on 25 February, 2022
This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants for quashing the summoning order dated 05.04.2022 and charge sheet dated 02.09.2021 arising out of Case Crime No.0292 of 2020, under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506, 354(Ka), 427, 452 I.P.C. and Section 3(1)(da), 3(1)(dha), 3(2)(va) SC/ST Act, Police Station Kandhai, District Pratapgarh in Sessions Trial No.0211 of 2022 (State vs. Shekhar and other) pending in the court of learned Special Judge (SC/ST) Act, Pratapgarh against the applicants.
R. P. Kapur vs The State Of Punjab on 25 March, 1960
The Apex Court decisions given in the case of R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab AIR 1960 SC 866, Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. Vs. Mohd. Saraful Haq, another (Para-10) 2005 SCC (Cr.)
M/S Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd.& ... vs Md Sharaful Haque & Anr on 1 November, 2004
The Apex Court decisions given in the case of R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab AIR 1960 SC 866, Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. Vs. Mohd. Saraful Haq, another (Para-10) 2005 SCC (Cr.)
Ahir Parbatbhai Godadbhai & 5 vs State Of Gujarat on 18 December, 2015
283 and Parabatbhai Ahir & Ors. Vs. State of Gujarat AIR 2017 SC 4843 and in the case of State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal 1992 SCC(Cr.) 426 have also recognized certain categories by way of illustration which may justify the quashing of a complaint or charge sheet.
State Of Haryana And Ors vs Ch. Bhajan Lal And Ors on 21 November, 1990
Hon'ble Apex Court in Bhajan Lal's case has recognized certain categories in which Section-482 of Cr.P.C. or Article-226 of the Constitution may be successfully invoked.
Satender Kumar Antil vs Central Bureau Of Investigation on 7 October, 2021
However, it is provided that if the applicants appear before the court below and apply for grant of bail, the court below shall consider and decide the same expeditiously, in accordance with law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antill Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and others : MANU/SC/1024/2021.
Chandra Deo Singh vs Prokash Chandra Bose & Anr on 22 January, 1963
Through a catena of decisions given by Hon'ble Apex Court this legal aspect has been expatiated upon at length and the law that has evolved over a period of several decades is too well settled. The cases of (1) Chandra Deo Singh Vs. Prokash Chandra Bose AIR 1963 SC 1430 , (2) Vadilal Panchal Vs. Dattatraya Dulaji Ghadigaonker AIR 1960 SC 1113 and (3) Smt. Nagawwa Vs. Veeranna Shivalingappa Konjalgi 1976 3 SCC 736 may be usefully referred to in this regard.