Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.53 seconds)D.Venkatasubramaniam & Ors vs M.K.Mohan Krishnamachari & Ors on 14 September, 2009
The Supreme Court in the case of D. Venkatasubramaniam v.
M.K. Mohan Krishnamachari reported in (2009) 10 SCC 488 has held
4
as under :-
Divine Retreat Centre vs State Of Kerala & Ors on 11 March, 2008
33. Yet another aspect of the matter, the
appellants have not been impleaded as party
respondents in the criminal petition in which the
whole of the allegations are levelled against them.
The High Court never thought it fit to put the
appellants on notice before issuing appropriate
directions to the police to arrest, seize the property
and file charge sheet. This Court in Dinine Retreat
Centre V. State of Kerala & Ors. (2008) 3 SCC 542
observed: (SCC p.565, para 51)
"51..........We are concerned with the question
as to whether the High Court could have
passed a judicial order directing investigation
against the appellant and its activities without
providing an opportunity of being heard to it.
The case on hand is a case where the criminal
law is directed to be set in motion on the basis
of the allegations made in anonymous petition
filed in the High Court. No judicial order can
ever be passed by any court without providing
a reasonable opportunity of being heard to the
person likely to be affected by such order and
particularly when such (2008) 3 SCC 542
order results in drastic consequences of
affecting one's own reputation."
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 294 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 323 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 324 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 506 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Mahender Chawla vs Union Of India Ministry Of Home Affairs ... on 5 December, 2018
"i.) That, to issue a direction to the respondent No- 1 to 3 for
providing the protection to the petitioner from the
atrocities of the respondent no. 6-9 and his family
members and appropriate orders may kindly be passed as
enumerated in the case of Mahendra Chawla & Ors.
vs. Union of India reported in (2019) 14 SCC 615.