Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 18 (0.58 seconds)Section 482 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
M/S Rare Creations Limited vs Union Of India And Another on 16 April, 2009
3. At the hearing, learned counsel for petitioners had placed reliance
upon decisions in R.C.Gupta & Ors. v. State & Anr. 2008 [1] JCC 684;
Central Bank of India vs. M/s. Asian Global Ltd. & Ors. JT 2010 (7) SC
88; National Small Industries Corporation Ltd. Vs. Harmeet Singh
Paintal & Anr. JT 2010 (2) SC 161; Arun Sood Vs. P. K. Roy 2012 [3]
JCC 2107; Subhankar Biswas Vs. Sandeep Meta 2011 (267) E.L.T 433
(S.C.); M/s. Rare Creations Ltd. & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Anr. 2010
[1] JCC 456 and Devashis Bharracharya Vs. Union of India 159 (2009)
DLT 780 to raise three contentions which are as follow: -
Sh. Devashis Bharracharya vs Union Of India & Anr. on 21 April, 2009
3. At the hearing, learned counsel for petitioners had placed reliance
upon decisions in R.C.Gupta & Ors. v. State & Anr. 2008 [1] JCC 684;
Central Bank of India vs. M/s. Asian Global Ltd. & Ors. JT 2010 (7) SC
88; National Small Industries Corporation Ltd. Vs. Harmeet Singh
Paintal & Anr. JT 2010 (2) SC 161; Arun Sood Vs. P. K. Roy 2012 [3]
JCC 2107; Subhankar Biswas Vs. Sandeep Meta 2011 (267) E.L.T 433
(S.C.); M/s. Rare Creations Ltd. & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Anr. 2010
[1] JCC 456 and Devashis Bharracharya Vs. Union of India 159 (2009)
DLT 780 to raise three contentions which are as follow: -
The Assistant Director, Enforcement ... vs Khader Sulaiman, P. Krishnasamy And J. ... on 9 January, 2003
4. To resist this petition, learned Central Government Standing
Counsel on behalf of respondents had placed reliance upon decisions in
The Assistant Director, Enforcement Directorate, Government of India
Vs. Khader Sulaiman, P. Krishnasamy and J. Sampath Kumar, 2003 Cri.
A.S.G. Jothimani Nadar vs The Deputy Director, Enforcement ... on 24 February, 1984
L.J. 3468; A S G Jothimani Nadar Vs. Deputy Director, Enforcement
Directorate 1984 Law Suit(Mad) 47 decided on 24.02.1984; LPA
No.405/2009 J.K.Singh, Director, M/s. Mesco Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Vs.
Crl.M.C.5063/2006 Page 2 of 5
UOI & Ors. decided on 08th September 2009; N. Rangachari Vs. Bharat
Sanchar Nigam Limited JT 2007 (6) SC 292 and Standard Chartered
Bank & Ors. Vs. Directorate of Enforcement & Ors., (2006) 4 SCC 278
and had asserted that the contentions of petitioners are untenable because
notice under Section 51 of FERA served upon petitioners constitutes a
valid notice for the purpose of proviso to Section 61 (2) of FERA.
N. Rangachari vs Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd on 19 April, 2007
L.J. 3468; A S G Jothimani Nadar Vs. Deputy Director, Enforcement
Directorate 1984 Law Suit(Mad) 47 decided on 24.02.1984; LPA
No.405/2009 J.K.Singh, Director, M/s. Mesco Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Vs.
Crl.M.C.5063/2006 Page 2 of 5
UOI & Ors. decided on 08th September 2009; N. Rangachari Vs. Bharat
Sanchar Nigam Limited JT 2007 (6) SC 292 and Standard Chartered
Bank & Ors. Vs. Directorate of Enforcement & Ors., (2006) 4 SCC 278
and had asserted that the contentions of petitioners are untenable because
notice under Section 51 of FERA served upon petitioners constitutes a
valid notice for the purpose of proviso to Section 61 (2) of FERA.
Standard Chartered Bank And Others vs Directorate Of Enforcement And Others on 24 February, 2006
L.J. 3468; A S G Jothimani Nadar Vs. Deputy Director, Enforcement
Directorate 1984 Law Suit(Mad) 47 decided on 24.02.1984; LPA
No.405/2009 J.K.Singh, Director, M/s. Mesco Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Vs.
Crl.M.C.5063/2006 Page 2 of 5
UOI & Ors. decided on 08th September 2009; N. Rangachari Vs. Bharat
Sanchar Nigam Limited JT 2007 (6) SC 292 and Standard Chartered
Bank & Ors. Vs. Directorate of Enforcement & Ors., (2006) 4 SCC 278
and had asserted that the contentions of petitioners are untenable because
notice under Section 51 of FERA served upon petitioners constitutes a
valid notice for the purpose of proviso to Section 61 (2) of FERA.
National Small Industries Corp.Ltd vs Harmeet Singh Paintal & Anr on 15 February, 2010
3. At the hearing, learned counsel for petitioners had placed reliance
upon decisions in R.C.Gupta & Ors. v. State & Anr. 2008 [1] JCC 684;
Central Bank of India vs. M/s. Asian Global Ltd. & Ors. JT 2010 (7) SC
88; National Small Industries Corporation Ltd. Vs. Harmeet Singh
Paintal & Anr. JT 2010 (2) SC 161; Arun Sood Vs. P. K. Roy 2012 [3]
JCC 2107; Subhankar Biswas Vs. Sandeep Meta 2011 (267) E.L.T 433
(S.C.); M/s. Rare Creations Ltd. & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Anr. 2010
[1] JCC 456 and Devashis Bharracharya Vs. Union of India 159 (2009)
DLT 780 to raise three contentions which are as follow: -