Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.22 seconds)Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 300A in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 19 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Arbitration Act, 1940
State Of U.P. & Ors vs Bridge & Roof Co. (India) Ltd on 20 August, 1996
7. As per the said clause, if the claim amount is more than 50,000/-
one has to approach the Civil Court. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in
7
State of U.P. & Others v. Bridge & Roof Company (India) Ltd 1 at
Para No.21 held as follows:
M.P. Power Management Company Limited vs M/S Sky Power Southeast Solar India ... on 16 November, 2022
8. Recently in M.P.Power Management Company Limited v. Sky
Power Southeast Solar India Private Limited Company2 the
Hon'ble Apex Court held that in the following:
Abl International Ltd. & Anr vs Export Credit Guarantee Corportion Of ... on 18 December, 2003
Ordinarily, the cases of termination of contract by the
State, acting within its contractual domain, may not lend itself
for appropriate redress by the writ court. This is, undoubtedly,
so if the Court is duty- bound to arrive at findings, which
involve untying knots, which are presented by disputed
questions of facts. Undoubtedly, in view of ABL(ABL
International Ltd., v. Export Credit Guarantee Corpn.of India
Ltd., (2004) 3 SCC 553), if resolving the dispute, in a case of
repudiation of a contract, involves only appreciating the true
scope of documentary material in the light of pleadings, the
Court may still grant relief to an applicant. We must enter a
caveat. The Courts are today reeling under the weight of a
docket explosion, which is truly alarming. If a case involves a
large body of documents and the Court is called upon to enter
upon findings of facts and involves merely the construction of
the document, it may not be an unsound discretion to
relegate the party to the alternate remedy. This is not to
deprive the Court of its constitutional power as laid down in
ABL. It all depends upon the facts of each case as to
whether, having regard to the scope of the dispute to be
resolved, whether the Court will still entertain the petition."..."
1