Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.25 seconds)

Syed Mohd. Salie Labbai (Dead) By L.Rs. ... vs Mohd. Hanifs (Dead) By L.Rs. And Ors on 22 March, 1976

In fairness to Mr. S.S. Asghar Hussain, learned Counsel for the petitioners, reference must be made to Sved Mohd. Salie Labbai's case (AIR 1976 SC 1569) (supra). This, however, merely lays down the larger incidents of Wakf property and of Kabristans, including family or private graveyards and a public graveyard. There is no quarrel with rhe general proposition laid down therein. But. 1 am unable to see how this, in any way, advances the case of the petitioners with regard to the ambit and applicability of the Act to the said lands.
Supreme Court of India Cites 19 - Cited by 278 - S M Ali - Full Document

Abdul Jalil And Ors. vs State Of U.P. And Ors. on 14 February, 1984

That being so, Kabristan land would have to be treated identically. In fairness, one must notice some shade of distinction in the matter, because in a graveyard the dead bodies stand interred in the land, whilst it is not so in a cremation ground. Nevertheless, neither of the two is agricultural land as such, and, therefore, if one is expressly within the scope of consolidation, one does not see why the other can logically be excluded therefrom. Learned, Counsel for the respondents had rightly placed some reliance on the recent judgment in Abdul Jalil v. State of U.P. (1984) 2 SCC 138 : (AIR 1984 SC 882 at P. 884), wherein it has been observed as under : --
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 8 - V D Tulzapurkar - Full Document
1