Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.28 seconds)

Birendra Sah vs State Of Bihar on 9 February, 2000

that in View of the fact that the has_:4ton"support f family consisting of his wife and minor.chi1dren,..Vfthenn sentence of imprisonment years' imposede" on the accused for the said effence,ha_rsh and..therefore, the same deserves to be against"'this. learned High Court Government contends that the Trial Court, after" faet and also other submissions made on behalf nof,jaecu.sfe'd. and also following the judgments of the Sup1~e_me..C2ourtfr.eported in 11.12 2004 Kamataka A1'-a§37;,._---{ista,;e offitmjab Vs. Ramdev Singh and (2000) 4 V Journal page 3673 (Birendra Sah Vs. 'State fiihar) has rightly imposed the said sentence and as such, it does not call for interference in this appeal. The .
1