Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.21 seconds)

S. Renuka & Ors vs State Of A. P. & Anr on 21 March, 2002

In S. Renuka & Ors. Vs. State of A.P. & Anr., (2002) 5 SCC 195 the Supreme Court considered a challenge to reservation for all the posts of Judges of Family Courts and Mahila Courts in State of Andhra Pradesh for women and held that there could not be 100% reservation for women. The posts were created for District and Sessions Judges. There were no separate post of Judges of Family Court and Mahila Courts.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 39 - S N Variava - Full Document

Vijay Lakshmi vs Punjab University And Others on 23 September, 2003

In Vijay Lakshmi's case the Supreme Court upholding Rule 5, 8 and 10 of Punjab University Calender Vol.III providing for appointment of lady Principal in Women's College and lady Superintendent for Girls Hostel, observed that there could be classification between male and female for certain posts without any arbitrariness. The discrimination is the essence of classification and does violence to the constitutional guarantee of equality only if it rests on an unreasonable basis. It is for the respondents to establish that classification is unreasonable and bears no rational nexus with the purported object. Certain posts may be left for only lady officers at the discretion of the State Government for special jobs which may be performed only by women.
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 147 - Full Document

Government Of Andhra Pradesh vs P.B. Vijayakumar & Anr on 12 May, 1995

15. Article 15 (1) prohibits the State from discriminating any citizen on the grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex, place of birth or any of them. Special provisions can be made for women 6 and children under Clause (3) of Article 15. These special provisions, however, should not provide 100% reservation in favour of women on any post in public employment, if it causes invidious, uninformed and hostile discrimination to males. Art.16 restricts discrimination in employment and thus whittles down the reservation of post for women under Art.15 (3). The distribution of posts between male and female has not been held to be arbitrary or unjustified in Vijay Lakshmi Vs. Punjab University, AIR 2003 SC 3331, and reservation for women in direct recruitment upto the extent of 30% in Andhra Pradesh has also been upheld within the ambit of Art.15 (3) vide Government of A.P. Vs. P.B. Vijaykumar, AIR 1995 SC 1648. The reservation of all the posts for women without any valid and compelling reason or classification, however, does not stand the scrutiny of Art.14, 15 (1) and 16 of the Constitution of India.
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 176 - R M Sahai - Full Document
1