Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 20 (0.28 seconds)Section 161 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 161 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 164 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Sri Jayendra Saraswathy ... vs State Of Tamil Nadu And Others on 26 October, 2005
98. Moreover,
as observed in the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the
case of Jayendra Saraswathi Swamigal v. State
of T.N., reported in (2005) 2 SCC 13, the
same contentions with regard to the apprehension of tampering with
witnesses have been considered and therefore, in light of the
guidelines with regard to grant of bail, the present application
deserves to be allowed.
Kalyan Chandra Sarkar vs Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu Yadav & Anr on 18 January, 2005
He pointedly referred to the observations in Para
16 to emphasise that, relying upon the judgment of the Apex Court in
the case of Kalyan
Chandra Sarkar v. Rajesh Ranjan
[(2004) 7n SCC 528] the same contentions were made with regard to
tampering with the witnesses and the public interest, the Apex Court
has in this judgment clearly observed that the case of Kalyan Chandra
Sarkar was decided on its own peculiar facts where seven applications
for bail were made before the High Court and were rejected and it has
no general application in every case.
State Of Gujarat vs Lalji Popat And Ors. on 2 April, 1988
(Rajesh H. Shukla, J.)
FURTHER
ORDER
After the
order was pronounced, learned counsel Mr. Ravani for the CBI as well
as learned counsel Dr. Mukul Sinha have requested that the order may
be stayed for a period of three weeks to enable them to carry the
matter before the Hon'ble Apex Court. Learned counsel Mr. Ravani has
also referred to and relied upon the judgment of this High Court in
the case of State of Gujarat v. Lalji Popat and ors., reported
in 1988(2) GLH 114 , stating that considering the nature of offence,
the release of the applicant on bail may prejudice the prosecution.