Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (0.36 seconds)
State Of Maharashtra vs Arun Gulab Gawali on 23 November, 1989 cites

Shahzad Hasan Khan vs Ishtiaq Hasan Khan & Anr on 28 April, 1987

11. Mrs. Rao, learned Public Prosecutor relied upon Shahzad Hasan Khan v. Ishtiaq Hasan Khan, and urged that the learned Magistrate erred in considering the application after the High Court had rejected it. The reliance on this judgment is totally misconceived. Her argument about judicial discipline is inappropriate. In the case of Shahzad Hasan Khan, successive applications were made in the same Court to different Judges and it is in this context that the question of judicial discipline was decided. In this case, the learned Magistrate was within his authority in considering the application for bail based on subsequent events.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 224 - M P Thakkar - Full Document

Shyam Lal vs 1. The State Of Uttar Pradesh2. The Union ... on 30 March, 1954

This is a deplorable way of citing judgments. Such performance is of no assistance either to the prosecution, to the State, to the public or to the Court. The traditions of advocacy on the Appellate Side are very high. Counsel read the judgments at home, absorb the ratio and then come to the Court to state the facts and the propositions laid down in judgments. But the learned Additional Public Prosecutor chose to break from this tradition and left the reference which the Court was left to read and consider. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has a responsible function to perform and ought to study the judgment before referring to it. Notwithstanding this approach of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, I have gone through the judgment.
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 225 - Full Document
1   2 Next