Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 32 (0.05 seconds)Section 471 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 13 in The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 315 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 10 in The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 120B in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 468 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
C. Chenga Reddy And Ors vs State Of Andhra Pradesh on 12 July, 1996
In C. Chenga Reddy v. State of A.P., this Court held that even
when codal violations were established and it was also proved that
there were irregularities committed by allotting/awarding the work
in violation of circulars, that by itself was not sufficient to prove that
a criminal case was made out. The Court went on to hold:
Abdulla Mohammed Pagarkar vs State (Union Territory Of Goa, Daman And ... on 11 September, 1979
In Abdulla Mohd. Pagarkar
v. State (UT of Goa, Daman and Diu), under somewhat similar
circumstances this Court opined that mere disregard of relevant
provisions of the Financial Code as well as ordinary norms of
procedural behaviour of government officials and contractors,
without conclusively establishing, beyond a reasonable doubt,
the guilt of the officials and contractors concerned, may give
rise to a strong suspicion but that cannot be held to establish the
guilt of the accused. The established circumstances in this
case also do not establish criminality of the appellants beyond
the realm of suspicion and, in our opinion, the approach of the
trial Court and the High Court to the requirements of proof in
relation to a criminal charge was not proper."