cites: 147152125

Singhai Rakesh Kumar vs Union Of India & Ors on 28 November, 2000

3.4 The applicant was posted in Ward (2) and had no jurisdiction over Ward (1) to which the case at S. No. 6 (Ankit Rajpal) belonged. Page 3 of 14 CAT,Lucknow Bench OA No. 332/00304 of 2022 Rakesh Kumar Singh Vs. U.O.I. &Ors 3.5 Though it was alleged that the applicant has opened fake bank accounts, there was no evidence to support it.

Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 111 - Full Document

Union Of India vs H. C. Goel on 30 August, 1963

In Union of India v. H.C. Goel this Court held at p. 728 that if the conclusion, upon consideration of the evidence reached by the disciplinary authority, is perverse or suffers from patent error on the face of the record or based on no evidence at all, a writ of certiorari could be issued."

Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 905 - N R Ayyangar - Full Document

State Bank Of Bikaner & Jaipur vs Nemi Chand Nalwaya on 1 March, 2011

In State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur v. Nemi Chand Nalwaya, a two Judge Bench of this Court held as below:

Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 335 - Full Document

Chairman & Md V.S.P. & Ors vs Goparaju Sri Prabhakara Hari Babu on 5 March, 2008

In Chairman & Managing Director, V.S.P. and Others v. Goparaju Sri Prabhakara Hari Babu, a two Judge Bench of this Court referred to several precedents on the Doctrine of Proportionality of the order of punishment passed by the Disciplinary Authority and held that :

Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 128 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Union Of India & Ors vs P.Gunasekaran on 3 November, 2014

(emphasis supplied) By considering the 200 alleged fraudulent refunds and tracing the applicant's involvement in 43 of such refunds, which did not form part of the charges against the applicant and were not enquired into in terms of the CCS (CCA) Rules, the appellate authority, in our view, has disabled itself from reaching a fair conclusion and has also allowed itself to be influenced by considerations extraneous to the charge sheet. Thus we find that the order dated 25.05.2022 falls foul of the parameters set forth in P Gunasekaran (supra) in the aforementioned terms and is bad in law.

Supreme Court of India Cites 16 - Cited by 856 - Full Document

Singhai Rakesh Kumar vs Union Of India & Ors on 28 November, 2000

Union Of India vs H. C. Goel on 30 August, 1963

State Bank Of Bikaner & Jaipur vs Nemi Chand Nalwaya on 1 March, 2011

Chairman & Md V.S.P. & Ors vs Goparaju Sri Prabhakara Hari Babu on 5 March, 2008

Union Of India & Ors vs P.Gunasekaran on 3 November, 2014

Union Of India And Others vs Ex. Constable Karam Veer Singh on 27 August, 2012

The Indian Evidence Act, 1872

Union Of India vs Sardar Bahadur on 29 October, 1971

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results