Haryana Judges Association vs State Of Haryana And Another on 7 February, 2013
***
It is the contention of the counsel for the petitioner that
vide judgment dated 07.02.2013 (Annexure P-2) passed in CWP No.
14573 of 2011 titled as Haryana Judges Association vs. State of
Haryana and another, Clause 4 of the Circular dated 28.12.2010
was held to be illegal and violative of the equality in the matter of
benefits to the State employees. As a consequence thereof,
petitioner was held entitled to the benefit of cash payment in lieu of
Leave Travel Concession. Vide reply to the Miscellaneous
Application i.e. C.M. No. 3727 of 2014 preferred by the petitioner, it
was stated that the petitioner would be entitled to the benefit of the
current block year 2012-2015, which is going on and would not be
entitled to the benefit of the block year 2008-2011. While disposing
PRERNA DATTA
2014.11.18 16:26
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this document
High Court, Chandigarh
COCP No.3193 of 1994 2
of the said application vide order dated 11.07.2014 (Annexure P-5),
the Division Bench clarified that the legal consequences of the order
alone are required to be examined in appropriate proceedings.
Counsel, therefore, contends that the appropriate proceedings would
be one, which are now initiated by the petitioner.