Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 18 (0.24 seconds)

Secr.,A.P.D.Jain Pathshala & Ors vs Shivaji Bhagwat More & Ors on 4 July, 2011

5. While the matter was being heard, learned counsel for petitioners Mr. V.D. Sapkal has laid stress on that respondent no.3 has no competence and jurisdiction to deal with the matter pursuant to sub-clause (5) of clause 86 of the Code of 1997 and to decide the appeal. Aforesaid arguments were based on the ground that creation of adjudicatory authority under clause 86 and sub-clause (5) thereof, is not relatable to any provision of rule or law or for that matter any Constitutional Article and such creation in exercise of powers under Article 162 of the Constitution of India by the executive is not valid, neither legal nor would have any efficacy. Such instructions are beyond the scope of powers under Article 162 ::: Uploaded on - 06/10/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 07/10/2017 00:38:58 ::: 5 WP - 8120-2011 of the Constitution of India. Said submissions are made with reference to a decision of the Supreme Court of India in the case of Secretary, Sh.A.P.D. Jain Pathshala and others Vs. Shivaji Bhagwat More and others, 2011 DGLS (SC) 492 : 2011(13) SCC 99. Learned counsel, during the course of his submissions had placed reliance on the observations as are appearing in paragraph no. 16 of said judgment, which reads thus :-
Supreme Court of India Cites 20 - Cited by 57 - R V Raveendran - Full Document
1   2 Next