Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.22 seconds)
G.Rajammal vs M/S S.S.V.Transport on 29 November, 2018 cites

Sarla Verma & Ors vs Delhi Transport Corp.& Anr on 15 April, 2009

8. A perusal of the records shows that the tribunal fixed monthly income of the deceased as Rs.3,000/- per month and adopted multiplier of '10'. As per the decision in Sarla Verma and others Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation and another reported in (2009) 6 SCC 121, the proper multiplier is 18, since the deceased was aged 19 years on the date of accident.
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 20141 - R V Raveendran - Full Document

Tata Aig General Insurance Co. Ltd. ... vs Pranay Sethi And Ors. Reported In Air ... on 2 August, 2018

Further more, as per the decision of a Constitution Bench of the Honourable Supreme Court in National http://www.judis.nic.in Insurance Company Vs. Pranay Sethi and others reported in 2017(2) TN MAC 601, future prospects at 40% should be added to the income of the deceased. As 4 far as the present case is concerned, the contention of the appellants is that their son was earning a sum of Rs.3,500/- per month and Rs.1,500/- towards overtime. Though no documentary evidence was adduced to prove the same, considering the fact that the deceased was employed in M/s M/s Accenture Software company, Solinganallur as house keeper, a sum of Rs.4,500/- is fixed as monthly income of the deceased. To this, 40% is added towards future prospects (4,500+1800=6300). Since the deceased was bachelor on the date of accident, half of the amount has to be deducted towards his personal expenses. Therefore, Loss of dependecy is awarded at (3150x12x18) Rs.6,80,400/-. In addition to that, the claimants are entitled to Rs.15,000, Rs.15,000/- and Rs.40,000/- towards Loss of Estate, Funeral Expenses and Loss of consortium respectively. The revised award of compensation under various heads is extracted hereunder.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 39 - R Kumar - Full Document
1