Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (1.13 seconds)

Bhupinder Sharma vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 16 October, 2003

To insist on corroboration, except in the rarest of rare cases, is to equate one who is a victim of the lust of another with an accomplice to a crime and thereby insult womanhood. It would be adding insult to injury to tell a woman that her claim of rape will not be believed unless it is corroborated in material particulars, as in the case of an accomplice to a crime. Why should the evidence of the girl or the woman who Page 15 of 21 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Crl.A. No.261 of 2018 complains of rape or sexual molestation be viewed with the aid of spectacles fitted with lenses tinged with doubt, disbelief or suspicion? The plea about lack of corroboration has no substance {See Bhupinder Sharma v. State of Himachal Pradesh(2003)8SCC 551). Notwithstanding this legal position, in the instant case, we even find enough corroborative material as well, which is discussed hereinabove.”(Emphasis supplied)….”
Supreme Court of India Cites 17 - Cited by 233 - A Pasayat - Full Document
1   2 Next