Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 22 (0.38 seconds)The Payment Of Bonus Act, 1965
Section 32 in The Payment Of Bonus Act, 1965 [Entire Act]
The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
Sardar Inder Singh vs The State Of Rajasthan(And Connected ... on 8 February, 1957
It will be noticed from the above rulings in Hamdard
Dawakhana (supra), Sardar Inder Singh (supra) and Tulsipur
Sugar Co. Ltd. (supra) which are cases of 'conditional
legislation' that this Court while dealing with mere
extension of the provisions of an Act to other areas,
persons etc. has categorically held the same to be
`conditional' legislation . On the other hand 'price
fixation' etc.
Section 10 in The Payment Of Bonus Act, 1965 [Entire Act]
The Visakhapatnam Port Trust & Anr vs M/S Ram Bahadur Thakur Pvt. Ltd. Etc on 10 February, 1997
In this connection we may also refer to a decision of
this Court in the case of Visakhapatnam Port Trust and
another v. Ram Bahadur Thakur Pvt. Ltd and others [(1997) 4
SCC 582] wherein this Court had to consider the question
whether the appropriate Government while modifying or
cancelling the rates of welfare charges framed by the
Visakhapatnam Port exercising powers under Section 52 and 54
of the Major Trusts Act. 1963 was required to hear the
parties likely to be affected by such an exercise.
Considering the scheme of Sections 52, 53 and 54 of the
said Act it was held that the scale of rates and statement
of conditions framed by the Port once sanctioned by the
Central Government and published by the Board in the
official gazette operate on their own and at this stage
parties affected were not to be heard. However while
considering the modification or cancellation of the rates in
exercise of powers under Section 54 of the said Act the
Central Government could appropriately consider the
representations of the parties likely to be affected by such
modification. In paragraph 15 of the Report on Point No.4
the following observation were made in this connections: