Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 19 (0.21 seconds)Section 279 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 134 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd vs Premlata Shukla & Ors on 15 May, 2007
29. In the facts of the present case, if the FIR is read
as a whole, it is clear that the first informant had
specifically pleaded that though the deceased fell off
the vehicle after hitting the pothole, he suffered
injuries on account of the fact that the vehicle
belonging to the first respondent, which was being
driven in a rash and negligent manner, ran over him.
On a reading of the FIR as a whole, as held in Oriental
Insurance Co. Ltd., vs. Premlata Shukla and Others,
(2007) 2 TNMAC 106 (SC), I am able to come to the
conclusion that the accident occurred on account of the rash
and negligent manner in which the offending vehicle was
driven.
Section 337 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 166 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 304 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 187 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
T. O. Anthony vs Karvarnan And Others on 1 February, 2008
The decision in T.O. Anthony v. Karvarnan [(2008) 3 SCC
748 : (2008) 1 SCC (Civ) 832 : (2008) 2 SCC (Cri) 738] has
been relied upon in A.P. SRTC v. K. Hemlatha [(2008) 6 SCC
767 : (2008) 3 SCC (Cri) 34] .