Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.19 seconds)

Vincent Panikurlangara vs Union Of India & Ors on 3 March, 1987

16. It would be relevant at this stage to reproduce the observations of the Hon. Apex Court in (1987) 2 SCC 165 in the case of „Vincent Panikurlangara v. Union of India & others‟, who held that in a welfare State, it is the obligation of the State to ensure the creation and the sustaining of conditions congenial to good health. Their Lordships observed that, a healthy body is the very foundation for all human activities. That is why the adage "Sariramadyam Khaludharma Sadhanam". In a welfare State, therefore, it is the obligation of the State to ensure the creation and the sustaining of conditions congenial to good health.
Supreme Court of India Cites 17 - Cited by 103 - M Rangnath - Full Document

Paschim Banga Khet Mazdoorsamity Of Ors vs State Of West Bengal & Anr on 6 May, 1996

18. Their Lordships of Hon. Apex Court in (1996) 4 SCC Page 37 in the case of „Paschim Banga Khet Mazdoor Society & others v. State of W.B. & another‟, have held that the Constitution envisages the establishment of a welfare State at the federal level as well as at the State level. In a welfare State, the primary duty of the Government is to secure the welfare of the people.
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 182 - S C Agrawal - Full Document
1