Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 21 (2.41 seconds)Section 94 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 151 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
The Mines And Minerals (Development And Regulation) Act, 1957
Section 34 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Chief Information Commissioner vs High Court Of Gujarat on 4 March, 2020
Per contra, learned Senior counsel appearing for the petitioners
submitted that Rules framed by the High Court are mandatory, no one can
divert from this and Rules framed by the High Court are not to be
overlooked. He has relied on the para 17 of judgment passed by Hon'ble
Supreme Court in the case of Chief Information Commissioner Vs. High of
Gujarat and Another reported in 2020 (4) SCC 702 in which it has been held
as under:-
Commissioner Of Income Tax,Mumbai vs Anjum M.H.Ghaswala & Ors on 18 October, 2001
It is well settled that if the law requires a particular thing to be
done in a particular manner, then, in order to be valid the act
must be done in the prescribed manner alone [See:
Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai v. Anjum M.H.
Ghaswala and ors. (2002) 1 SCC 633; Captain Sube Singh and
Ors. v. Lt. Governor of Delhi and Ors. (2004) 6 SCC 440; State
of U.P. v. Singhara Singh AIR 1964 SC 358; and Mohinder
Singh Gill v. Chief Election Commissioner (1978) 1 SCC 405].
Absence of the Central Government's approval to reservation and
a notification as required by Section 17A, therefore, renders the
State Government's claim of reservation untenable till such time
a valid reservation is made in accordance with law. It is trite that
the State Government's general executive power cannot be
invoked to make a reservation dehors Section 17A.
Captain Sube Singh & Ors vs Lt. Governor Of Delhi & Ors on 30 April, 2004
It is well settled that if the law requires a particular thing to be
done in a particular manner, then, in order to be valid the act
must be done in the prescribed manner alone [See:
Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai v. Anjum M.H.
Ghaswala and ors. (2002) 1 SCC 633; Captain Sube Singh and
Ors. v. Lt. Governor of Delhi and Ors. (2004) 6 SCC 440; State
of U.P. v. Singhara Singh AIR 1964 SC 358; and Mohinder
Singh Gill v. Chief Election Commissioner (1978) 1 SCC 405].
Absence of the Central Government's approval to reservation and
a notification as required by Section 17A, therefore, renders the
State Government's claim of reservation untenable till such time
a valid reservation is made in accordance with law. It is trite that
the State Government's general executive power cannot be
invoked to make a reservation dehors Section 17A.
State Of Uttar Pradesh vs Singhara Singh And Others on 16 August, 1963
It is well settled that if the law requires a particular thing to be
done in a particular manner, then, in order to be valid the act
must be done in the prescribed manner alone [See:
Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai v. Anjum M.H.
Ghaswala and ors. (2002) 1 SCC 633; Captain Sube Singh and
Ors. v. Lt. Governor of Delhi and Ors. (2004) 6 SCC 440; State
of U.P. v. Singhara Singh AIR 1964 SC 358; and Mohinder
Singh Gill v. Chief Election Commissioner (1978) 1 SCC 405].
Absence of the Central Government's approval to reservation and
a notification as required by Section 17A, therefore, renders the
State Government's claim of reservation untenable till such time
a valid reservation is made in accordance with law. It is trite that
the State Government's general executive power cannot be
invoked to make a reservation dehors Section 17A.
Mohinder Singh Gill & Anr vs The Chiief Election Commissioner, New ... on 2 December, 1977
It is well settled that if the law requires a particular thing to be
done in a particular manner, then, in order to be valid the act
must be done in the prescribed manner alone [See:
Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai v. Anjum M.H.
Ghaswala and ors. (2002) 1 SCC 633; Captain Sube Singh and
Ors. v. Lt. Governor of Delhi and Ors. (2004) 6 SCC 440; State
of U.P. v. Singhara Singh AIR 1964 SC 358; and Mohinder
Singh Gill v. Chief Election Commissioner (1978) 1 SCC 405].
Absence of the Central Government's approval to reservation and
a notification as required by Section 17A, therefore, renders the
State Government's claim of reservation untenable till such time
a valid reservation is made in accordance with law. It is trite that
the State Government's general executive power cannot be
invoked to make a reservation dehors Section 17A.