Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 50 (0.37 seconds)The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Trimex International Fze Ltd.Dubai vs Vedanta Aluminium Limited,India on 22 January, 2010
In Trimex International FZE (Supra), the Supreme Court
held that a contract can be concluded even by exchange of
communications... and conduct of parties may establish a binding
agreement.
Section 34 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Central Bank Of India vs Ravindra And Ors on 18 October, 2001
In Central Bank of India v. Ravindra
(supra), it was held that the Court may reduce the rate of interest if
CS (Comm) 2959/24 Page No. 51 of 54
M/s I Pack India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Haldiram Marketing P. Ltd.
it finds the same to be excessive, penal or unconscionable.
Section 35 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Union Of India vs Ibrahim Uddin & Anr on 17 July, 2012
It is a settled principle that mutually destructive pleas
undermine the credibility of a litigant. The Hon'ble Supreme
Court in Union of India v. Ibrahim Uddin (Supra) has held that "a
party cannot be permitted to take mutually destructive pleas.
Inconsistent pleas, which are self-contradictory, cannot be
permitted as they destroy the credibility of the case set up by the
party."