Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 38 (0.30 seconds)Section 21 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Section 31 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Section 11 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Section 31A in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Numaligarh Refinery Ltd vs Daelim Industrial Company Ltd on 6 September, 2007
If two views are possible either on
interpretation of contract or application of provisions thereof on
the given set of facts and Arbitrator has taken one of the possible
views; then the Court is not to interfere in exercise of jurisdiction
under Section 34 of the Act, in view of law laid by Supreme
Court in the cases (i) Associated Constructions vs Pawanhans
Helicopters Ltd., (2008) 16 SCC 128; (ii) G. Ramchandra
Reddy vs Union of India, (2009) 6 SCC 414; (iii) Numaligarh
Refinery Ltd. vs. Daelim Industrial Co. Ltd., (2007) 8 SCC 466.
Bhanumati Jaisukhbhai Bhuta vs Ivory Properties And Hotels Pvt Ltd And ... on 28 January, 2020
12. Bombay High Court in the case of Bhanumati J. Bhuta vs
Ivory Properties & Hotels Pvt. Ltd., 2020 SCC Online Bombay
157 has held that the arbitral proceedings commence in respect of
OMP (Comm.) No. 34/2022 GREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
vs M/S ADLAKHA ASSOCIATES PVT. LTD. & ANR. Page 17 of 34
dispute when notice invoking of arbitration agreement is received
by other side.
Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. ... vs Tehri Hydro Development Corporation ... on 7 February, 2019
In
the case of Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. (Jal) v. Tehri Hydro
Development Corporation India Ltd., MANU/SC/0157/2019, the
Supreme Court after noticing the provisions of the 1996 Act and
various judgments on the issue of interest, more particularly, the
recent judgment in the case of Reliance Cellulose Products Ltd. v.
ONGC Ltd., MANU/SC/0777/2018: (2018) 9 SCC 266, summed
up the law on interest as under: