Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 48 (0.34 seconds)Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Emperor vs Khwaja Nazir Ahmed on 17 October, 1944
AIR 1982 Punj & Har 372 since it was in conflict with the decision of the Privy Council in Emperor v. Khwaja Nazir Ahmad (AIR 1945 PC 18) (supra) and of the Supreme Court, in State of West Bengal v. Swapan Kumar Guha (AIR 1982 SC 949) (supra).
Article 141 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Mrs. Rupan Deol Bajaj & Anr vs Kanwar Pal Singh Gill & Anr on 12 October, 1995
The Apex Court quoted its observations in Pirthi Chand's case (AIR 1996 SC 977) (supra) and referred to the case of Mrs. Rupan Deol Bajaj (AIR 1996 SC 309) (supra) and or. merits the order passed by the High Court invoking its inherent power under Section 482, Cr. P. C. was quashed.
State Of Haryana And Ors vs Ch. Bhajan Lal And Ors on 21 November, 1990
In State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal (AIR 1992 SC 604) (supra) a two-Judge Bench of this Court laid down certain broad tests to exercise the inherent power or extraordinary power of the High Court. It is not necessary to reiterate the guidelines. Suffice it to state that they arc only illustrative. The High Court should sparingly and only in exceptional cases, in other words, in rarest of rare cases and not merely because it would be appealable to the learned Judge, be inclined to exercise the power to quash the FlR/charge-sheet/complaint. In that case the Court held that the FIR should not be quashed since it disclosed prima facie cognizable offences to proceed further in the investigation.
S.N. Sharma vs Bipen Kumar Tiwari And Ors on 10 March, 1970
39. After it the Apex Court made reference to the authorities of R. P. Kapur v. State of Punjab (AIR 1960 SC 866) (supra), S. N. Basak (AIR 1963 SC 447) (supra), S. N. Sharma (AIR 1970 SC 786) (supra), Hazari Lal Gupta (AIR 1972 SC 484) (supra), Jehan Singh (AIR 1974 SC 1146) (supra), Kurukshetra University (AIR 1977 SC 2229) (supra), J.A.C. Saldanna (AIR 1980 SC 326) (supra), Swapan Kumar Guha (supra) and R. K. Srivastava (1990 All LJ 62) (supra) and made the following observations in paras 108 and 109 its Judgment :
Puttan Alias Kamal Prasad vs State Of U.P. on 19 February, 1992
In fact the Full Bench had affirmed Puttan Singh's case and had overruled only Prashant's case.