cites: 147567191

Delhi Development Authority vs Sukhbir Singh & Ors on 9 September, 2016

2026.05.18 16:17:58 +0530 (Manish Jain) ACJM:Shahdara:KKD:Delhi State Vs. Sukhbir Singh etc. FIR No.: 325/2007 PS: Anand Vihar IPC against accused Sukhbir Singh and Narender Kumar Sharma beyond reasonable doubt and accordingly, both the accused persons are acquitted for the above stated offences.

Supreme Court of India Cites 54 - Cited by 106 - R F Nariman - Full Document

Section 420 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 395484

Section 120B in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 280525

The Indian Penal Code, 1860

Union of India - Act Cites 0 - Cited by 699242

Section 91 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 6089

Section 160 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 6838

Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 241306

Section 2 in The Bankers Books Evidence Act, 1891 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 131

Pulukuri Kottaya vs King-Emperor on 19 December, 1946

35.In Pulukuri Kottaya v. Emperor, it was held that only that portion of disclosure statement which distinctly relates to discovery of fact is admissible.

Bombay High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 918 - Full Document

M/S Indian Oil Corporation vs M/S Nepc India Ltd., & Ors on 20 July, 2006

38.The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Indian Oil Corporation v. NEPC India Ltd. (2006 INSC 452) cautioned against converting civil Digitally signed by MANISH page No. 16 of 18 MANISH JAIN JAIN Date:

Supreme Court of India Cites 20 - Cited by 1578 - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results