Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.20 seconds)Section 10A in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
The Statesman Ltd vs Their Workmen on 22 January, 1976
3. In support of the instant two petitions, Mr. Kar,
learned advocate appearing on behalf of the
respondent nos. 3 and 5 at the very outset draws
attention of this Court to the Order No. 184 dated
07.08.2014 as passed in connection with the Case
No. 01/2003/33(2)(b) (M/s. Statesman Limited Vs.
Their Workmen) by the learned Judge, 1st
Industrial Tribunal, Kolkata. It is submitted by
Mr. Kar that from the said order dated
07.08.2014, it would reveal that the said Tribunal
dismissed the writ petitioner's application under
Section 33(2)(b) of the said Act. It is thus,
submitted by Mr. Kar that by the order under
challenge, the said Tribunal thus did not accord
to the prayer as made by the writ
petitioner/company towards dismissal of the
respondents of the present writ petition.
Jaipur Zila Sahakari Bhoomi Vikas Bank ... vs Ram Gopal Sharma & Ors on 17 January, 2002
14. Such being the position and keeping in mind the
dictum of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of
9
Jaipur Zila Sahakari Bhoomi Vikas Bank
(Supra), this Court considers that for entertaining
the instant two applications, no separate award is
required to be passed by the Tribunal, especially
when, the said Tribunal rejects an application
under Section 33(2)(b) of the said Act.
1