Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.41 seconds)Section 8 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Section 6 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
The Union Of India vs Chhedu Singh Chauhan 40 Wps/8012/2018 ... on 5 December, 2018
In the context of providing the copy of the note sheets made by Sri B. K. Mallick, the
Commissioner, Haldia Commissionerate, the Commission referred to the decision of the Hon'ble
High Court of Delhi in the matter of Union of India vs. R.S. Khan WP (C) No. 9355 of 2009 and
CM No. 7144 of 2009 dated 07.10.2010 wherein it was held as under:
Collector Of Central Excise, Vadodra vs Rohit Pulp Paper Mills on 30 April, 1998
The Commission was in receipt of a written submission from the Appellant dated Nil wherein
while contesting the order of the FAA, he referred to the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court
in the matter of Collector of Central Excise vs. Rohit Pulp Papers Mills and the decision of the
Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court in the matter of Commissioner of Central Excise vs.
B. E. Office Automation.
Section 11 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Paras Nath And Anr. Mamman Singh And Ors vs Union Of India And Ors on 28 November, 1989
Furthermore, in a recent decision the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in its order dated 12.02.2018
in W.P.(C) 7845/2013 (Paras Nath Singh Vs. Union of India) had held as under:
Commissioner Of Central Excise Delhi ... vs M/S B.E. Office Automation Products ... on 14 December, 2009
The Commission was in receipt of a written submission from the Appellant dated Nil wherein
while contesting the order of the FAA, he referred to the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court
in the matter of Collector of Central Excise vs. Rohit Pulp Papers Mills and the decision of the
Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court in the matter of Commissioner of Central Excise vs.
B. E. Office Automation.
Centrlal Board Of Sec.Education & Anr vs Aditya Bandopadhyay & Ors on 9 August, 2011
In this context a reference was made to the Hon'ble Supreme Court decision in 2011 (8) SCC
497 (CBSE and Anr. Vs. Aditya Bandopadhyay and Ors), wherein it was held as under:
1