Radha Kishan Kungwani, Ajmer vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-1-2, Ajmer on 19 August, 2020
b) Radha Kishan Kungwani vs. ITO Ward - 1(2) ITA No. 1106/JP/2018 dtd.
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.96 seconds)Section 234B in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Section 234D in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Section 244A in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Finance Act, 2013
Sanjay Dattatraya Dapodikar,, Pune vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward - 6(2),, Pune on 30 April, 2019
c) Sanjay Dattatraya Dapodikar v/s ITO Ward - 6(2), Pune ITA No. 1747/PN/2018 dtd.
30/04/2019(Pune) (Trib)
Where date of agreement for fixing amount of consideration for purchase of a plot of
land and date of registration of sale deed were different but assessee, prior to date of
agreement, had paid a part of consideration by cheque, provisos to section
56(2)(vii)(b) being fulfilled, stamp value as on date of agreement should be applied for
purpose of said section
Mohd. Ilyas Chowdhary, Mumbai vs Ito 21(3(3), Mumbai on 10 April, 2017
f) Mohd. Ilyas Ansari v. ITO-23(2)(3),Mumbai [ITA No. 6174/M/2017dtd. 06/11/2020,
186 ITD 407 (Mumbai - Trib.)]
10 ITA No. 56/Mum/2021-Mr. Sajjanraj Mehta
Where Assessing Officer mechanically applied provisions of section 56(2) to difference
between stamp duty value and actual sale consideration paid by assessee and made
additions, without making any efforts to find out actual cost of property, additions
made by Assessing Officer were to be set aside."
Shri. Siraj Ahmed Jamalbhai Bora, ... vs Ito Ward 1(3)(1), Mumbai on 26 March, 2021
a) "Siraj Ahmed Jamalbhai Bora vs. ITO Ward - 1(3) (1) ITA No. 1886/M/2019 dtd.
1