cites: 148000505

Satish Kumar Batra & Ors vs State Of Haryana on 1 April, 2009

Announced in the open Court. (Rajeev Bansal) Dated:09.05.2012 ASJ-3/South District Saket Courts, New Delhi C.A. 4/12 Satish Kumar Vs. The State 8/8

Supreme Court of India Cites 19 - Cited by 146 - Full Document

Section 27 in The Arms Act, 1959 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 102484

Section 386 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 2493

C. Bhaskaran Nair vs State Of Kerala And Ors. on 27 February, 1986

The entire evidence is available to the appellate court to consider the guilt or innocence untrammeled by what the trial court said - Bhaskaran Nair vs. State of Kerala 1991 Cr LJ 23 Kerala. Keeping these broad principles in mind, I now proceed to discuss the evidence available on record.

Kerala High Court Cites 40 - Cited by 14 - Full Document

Section 25 in The Arms Act, 1959 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 97126

Chinnammal vs State Of Tamil Nadu & Ors on 20 November, 1996

In Chinnamal vs. State 1997 (1) SCC 145, it was held that C.A. 4/12 Satish Kumar Vs. The State 4/8 an appeal is to be decided on the basis of the evidence adduced by witnesses during the trial.

Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 15 - Full Document

Section 374 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 10556

Rama And Ors vs State Of Rajasthan on 5 April, 2002

In a criminal appeal a duty is enjoined upon the appellate court to re-appreciate the evidence itself and it cannot proceed to dispose of the appeal upon appraisal of evidence by the trial court alone - Rama vs. State 2002 (4) SCC 571.

Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 40 - B N Agrawal - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results