Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (2.55 seconds)Section 6 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
The Societies Registration Act, 1860
Centrlal Board Of Sec.Education & Anr vs Aditya Bandopadhyay & Ors on 9 August, 2011
223. However, the point which goes against the appellant clearly is that, the
information which is sought is a) voluminous b) repetitive and c) clogging the
entire administrative machinery of the public authorities concerned. This
cannot be allowed under the provisions of the RTI Act, the meaning of which
has been amplified in a crystal clear fashion by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the
case of CBSE vs Aditya Bandopadhya as quoted above.
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Section 8 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Section 19 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Section 29 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Shri Ketan Kantilal Modi vs Central Board Of Excise & Customs on 22 September, 2009
charge Administration, Air Headquarters, for units under their control, who
may fix the fees in consultation with the Government law officer, subject to
such restrictions regarding the maximum amounts payable to counsel as are
laid down by the Central Governement from time to time. Claims for expenses
in connection with counsel and witnesses will be accompanied by a certificate
from the legal remembrance that they are reasonable. No suit by or against
the Central Government, in respect of contracts relating to lands shall be filed
or defended without the prior sanction of the Central Government.
Maj. Gen. S. S. Dahiya, Pvsm, Vsm vs Ministry Of Defence (Mod) on 28 July, 2008
25. He also submitted a file containing the decision relied upon by him. He
relied on the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Ajay Hasia vs Khalid
Mujib, Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the matter of Rajesh Kumar vs Hony Joint
Secretary, AFWWA & Anr in WP(C) No-2710/1996, Commission decision in
S.S Dahiya vs CPIO MoD, Subhash Chandra Agarwal vs Supreme Court of
India, Lt Col R Bansal vs AWHO, B R Manhas vs JNMF, Ketan Kantilal Modi
vs CBEC. Basically he was stressing on the instrumentality of state. However,
the Commission finds the above reliance unsustainable. The appellant was
unable to give a cogent reason for filing repeated RTI application for the same
nature of queries.