Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.29 seconds)Section 498A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 3 in The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Section 4 in The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Kailash Chandra Agrawal & Anr vs State Of U.P.& Ors on 16 September, 2014
6. The Apex Court in Neelu Chopra Vs. Bharati1, Kailash Chandra Agarwal
Vs. State of UP2, Kansraj Vs. State of Punjab3 and Geeta Mehrotra Vs. State of
Utter Pradesh4, and Manoj Mahavirprasad Khaiton Vs. Ram Gopal Poddar5
categorically held that unless there are specific allegations in the complaint
against other relatives of husband, no cognizance can be taken against the family
members, more particularly from the tendency of making baseless allegations in
roping them.
Section 198 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Manoj Mahavir Prasad Khaitan vs Ram Gopal Poddar & Anr on 8 October, 2010
6. The Apex Court in Neelu Chopra Vs. Bharati1, Kailash Chandra Agarwal
Vs. State of UP2, Kansraj Vs. State of Punjab3 and Geeta Mehrotra Vs. State of
Utter Pradesh4, and Manoj Mahavirprasad Khaiton Vs. Ram Gopal Poddar5
categorically held that unless there are specific allegations in the complaint
against other relatives of husband, no cognizance can be taken against the family
members, more particularly from the tendency of making baseless allegations in
roping them.
Taramani Parakh vs State Of M.P. & Ors on 16 March, 2015
It is also held by the latest expression of the Apex Court in Taramanio
Parakh Vs. State of M.P.7 that if the allegations not make out a case, it can be
held as abuse of process to continue the crime proceedings. It is further held that
in matrimonial cases, Courts have to be cautious when omnibus allegations are
made particularly against relatives of husband. Coming to the family members of
the husband who are the petitioners-A.2 to A.5 and any specific overt acts with
date, time, and place to attribute any specific role against any of them, no
ingredients of the offences alleged supra that apply.
The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961
Shaikh Kusrouddin And Ors. vs State Of A.P. And Anr. on 20 July, 2004
Even a stray sentence as suffered harassment in the house of in-laws
not sufficient as held by this Court while quashing from such a bald statement in
Shhaik Kusrouddin Vs. State of A.P.6 against the in-laws and other relatives of the
husband.
1