Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 29 (0.36 seconds)Section 4 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 18 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Arun Kumar Agrawal vs Union Of India & Ors on 1 November, 2013
35. During final arguments, certain photographs were put
before this court on behalf of the respondents, which were also
showed to Ld. counsel for the petitioner. These photographs were
produced in order to show the surrounding locations of the
subject land. It was argued by Ld. counsel for the respondents
that acquired land is surrounded by the jhuggis/encroachments
and in front of the acquired properties there is an open Nala and
there was no proper access to approach the subject properties. It
was further argued that the petitioner of a connected case in LAC
No. 22/16 titled Arun Kumar Vs. UOI filed a writ petition before
the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi vide CWP No. 3624/2014 titled
Arun Kumar Vs. DMRC to remove the garbage and
encroachments in that area. They argued that the acquired
properties were only accessible through service road which is
totally encroached by the jhuggis. It was argued that just behind
the acquired properties there is an unauthorized residential
colony and there is no access to the subject land from that side.
These facts were not denied by the Ld. counsel for the petitioner.