cites: 148271093

1 - 10 of 25 (0.24 seconds)

Jeetu Kushwah vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 21 June, 2019 cites

Jeetu @ Jitendra Kushwah vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 21 January, 2019

This being the rule there may, of course, be exceptions. I will not attempt to lay down any oases of exceptions, because these oases before -( 12 )- MCRC No. 24121/2019 Jeetu Kushwaha vs. State of MP us are not exceptions and I do not want to say anything which will be only in the nature of an obiter dictum.

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Section 497 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 1684

Section 376DB in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 241

Section 437 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 17342

Section 439 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 688415

Section 376 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 10899

Section 496 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 936

Emperor vs H.L. Hutchinson on 23 April, 1931

Reference was also made to Emperor v. Hutchinson [1931 SCC OnLine All 14] wherein it was observed that grant of bail is the rule and refusal is the exception. The provision for bail is therefore age-old and the liberal interpretation to the provision for bail is almost a century old, going back to colonial days.

Allahabad High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 166 - Full Document

Section 376AB in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 1216

Section 376 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 188280

1 2 3 Next

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results