Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.28 seconds)
Dhani Chand & Ors vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 29 September, 2010 cites

State Of Haryana & Ors vs Manoj Kumar on 9 March, 2010

In State of Haryana & Ors. v Manoj Kumar, 2010[2] RCR[Civil] 296, the Hon'ble Supreme Court considered the question as to whether the stamp duty is liable to be affixed as per the Collector's rate prevailing on the date when the sale deed is presented for registration and/or at the rate when the 'agreement to sell' was executed. Their Lordships have ruled that the stamp duty is liable to be affixed as per the Collector's rate fixed on the date when the instrument is presented for registration.
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 162 - D Bhandari - Full Document

State Of Punjab & Others vs Parshotam Dass & Another on 2 August, 2010

[9]. To be fair to learned counsel for the petitioners, he has referred to a recent decision dated 02.08.2010 in LPA No. 890 of 2010 [State of Punjab & Ors. v Parshotam Dass & Anr.] to contend that when the allotment is made by a government agency through an open auction without there being any possibility of evasion of stamp duty, the stamp duty and registration charges are to be affixed as per the sale price mentioned in the allotment letter. In my considered view, firstly no such inference can be drawn from the CWP No. 1743 of 2009. ::-5-::
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 6 - A K Goel - Full Document
1