Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.93 seconds)

Commissioner Of Police, Bombay vs Gordhandas Bhanji on 23 November, 1951

The order dated 30.04.2011 has been made after hearing the parties and, being a quasi-judicial order, can be termed as a public order made in exercise of statutory powers vested in the Additional Secretary (Appeals). As has been held by the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Police, Bombay v. Gordhandas Bhanji (supra), public orders, publicly made, in exercise of a statutory authority cannot be construed in the light of explanations subsequently given by the officer making the order of what he meant, or of what was in his mind, or what he intended to do. This judgment would apply on all fours to the impugned order/ communication dated 06.08.2011, and on this ground as well, the impugned order cannot be permitted to stand.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 973 - V Bose - Full Document

Purtabpore Co. Ltd vs Cane Commissioner Of Bihar & Ors on 21 November, 1968

There is no dispute regarding the fact that while deciding a revision application under any of the above-quoted provisions of the Code, the Secretary is exercising quasi-judicial powers. Whether the Additional Secretary (Appeals) is acting as a quasi-judicial authority can be determined from the tests laid down by the Supreme Court, as stated in The Purtabpore Co. Ltd. v. Cane Commissioner of Bihar And Others (supra).
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 171 - K S Hegde - Full Document
1   2 Next