Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.39 seconds)The Employee's Compensation Act, 1923
Section 149 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 95 in Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 [Entire Act]
National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Dundamma And Others on 6 June, 1991
11. Therefore, in the light of the ruling in Dundamma 's case, regard being had to the evidence on record in the present case, we have to hold that there was no acceptable evidence enabling the Court below to hold that there was an agreement between the claimant and the owner of the vehicle to engage it for carrying the goods. Mere assertion that he had paid Rs. 25/- as fare to the driver does not result in a completed contract. In that view of the matter, it does not answer the provisions of Rule 163 of the Rules.
Section 95 in Gold (Control) Act, 1968 [Entire Act]
National Insurance Co. Ltd., New Delhi vs Jugal Kishore & Others on 9 February, 1988
This principle laid down in Jugal Kishore's case will not come to the aid of the insured.
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939
Section 66 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
1