cites: 1485795

V. Nataraja Iyer And Ors. vs Arunachalam And Ors. on 28 January, 1976

In this regard, learned counsel for the appellant/first plaintiff relied upon decisions of this Court reported in Vol.89 L.W. 574 (V.Nataraja Iyer Vs. Arunachalam) and 1988 (1) L.W. 198 (Periyanayagam Vs. Rajendran), wherein, it was held as follows:

Madras High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 12 - Full Document

The Limitation Act, 1963

Union of India - Act Cites 0 - Cited by 47361

Section 7 in The Court-fees Act, 1870 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 1660

Periyanayagam vs Rajendran And Ors. on 5 January, 1988

In this regard, learned counsel for the appellant/first plaintiff relied upon decisions of this Court reported in Vol.89 L.W. 574 (V.Nataraja Iyer Vs. Arunachalam) and 1988 (1) L.W. 198 (Periyanayagam Vs. Rajendran), wherein, it was held as follows:

Madras High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 5 - Full Document

Balu Alias Balakrishnan vs Minor B. Sasikumar And Ors. on 23 March, 2001

(a) 2001 (3) MLJ 15 (Balu alias Balakrishnan Vs. Minor B.Sasikumar):

Madras High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 6 - Full Document

Article 44 in Constitution of India [Constitution]

Constitution Article Cites 7 - Cited by 723

Article 60 in Constitution of India [Constitution]

Constitution Article Cites 7 - Cited by 526

Section 7 in Tamil Nadu Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 [Entire Act]

State of Tamilnadu - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 65

The Court-fees Act, 1870

Union of India - Act Cites 0 - Cited by 9073

Sridharan And Ors. vs Arumugam And Ors. on 19 March, 1993

18. It is pertinent to note a Division Bench decision of this Court reported in 1993 (2) MLJ 428 (Sridharan Vs. Arumugam), wherein, it was held as follows:

Madras High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 12 - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results