Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.19 seconds)Section 66 in The Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 [Entire Act]
Ravula Hariprasada Rao vs The State on 19 March, 1951
In
fact in Ravula Harprasada Rao's case(1) this Court held that
the ,liability imposed under S. 27(A) of the Motor Spirit
Rationing Order 1941 is an obsolute liability.
State Of Maharashtra vs Mayer Hans George on 24 August, 1964
The same view was reiterated by this ,Court in State of
Maharashtra v. Mayer Hans George (2) . But in both those
cases this Court recognized that the language of a provision
either plainly or by necessary implication can rule out the
application of that presumption. Further the Court may
decline to draw that presumption taking into consideration
the purpose intended to be served by that provision.
The Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 27 in The Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 [Entire Act]
1