Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.20 seconds)
M/S Ak.Rubber Industry vs Punjab State Electricity Board on 19 February, 2014 cites

Tirupati Industries vs Punjab State Electricity Board And Ors. on 20 September, 1999

The firm is engaged in processing the waste rubber and production made from raw material. The variation in the consumption of electricity before the detection was 18000 to 25000 units and after the detection on 3.7.1996 it rose to 33000 units in April 1997. Hence, the finding recorded vide order dated 9.8.2000 (Annexure P4) does not require any interference as the petitioner has been charged 25% as per provisions of CC 97/95. At this stage, reference can be made to a Division Bench judgment of this Kaur Rupinder 2014.02.28 11:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh C.W.P. No.13860 of 2000 [ 7 ] Court in Tirupati Industries v. Punjab State Electricity Board and others (2000) 125 PLR 356. The Division Bench was considering the commercial circular No.45 issued by the Board which required that when meters are changed under any meter change order, the same shall be sent to the ME Lab in a sealed card-Board box. The relevant clause 'c' of the said circular reads as under:-
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 18 - M S Gill - Full Document

State Of Orissa vs Dr. (Miss) Binapani Dei & Ors on 7 February, 1967

The writ petition was allowed and the impugned Kaur Rupinder 2014.02.28 11:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh C.W.P. No.13860 of 2000 [ 8 ] demand was declared illegal and it was held that the Executive Authorities were bound to act in accordance with the Administration/Executive instructions which regulate their actions. The testing of meter removed against any unit changed order was done by consumer or his representative. A notice should have been given to a consumer or his representative of the date, time and place of testing. Reference was made to a Supreme Court judgment in case of State of Orissa v. Dr. (Miss) Binapani Dei and others MANU/SC/0332/1967 in which it was observed as under:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 1001 - J C Shah - Full Document
1