Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.36 seconds)

Sri Kallalagar Devasthanam Through Its ... vs Anthony Moopan on 17 October, 1924

After referring to Kallalagar Devasthanam v. Anthony Mooppan (1924) 48 M.L.J. 147 which is the decision of a single Judge, the learned District Judge says that he is unable to follow it, in view of a later decision, also of a single Judge, in Nallakakkan Ambalam v. Sri Kallalagar Devasthanam (1925) 49 M.L.J. 628. This last decision, however, is clearly distinguishable. It arose under Section 46 of the Madras Estates Land Act which has since been repealed by the Amendment Act of 1934. Under Section 46(5) the sum payable in respect of "old waste" for the acquisition of occupancy right had to be paid to the land-holder " who is the owner of the estate."
Madras High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

Nallakakkan Ambalam vs Sri Kallalagar Devasthanam Through Its ... on 24 April, 1925

After referring to Kallalagar Devasthanam v. Anthony Mooppan (1924) 48 M.L.J. 147 which is the decision of a single Judge, the learned District Judge says that he is unable to follow it, in view of a later decision, also of a single Judge, in Nallakakkan Ambalam v. Sri Kallalagar Devasthanam (1925) 49 M.L.J. 628. This last decision, however, is clearly distinguishable. It arose under Section 46 of the Madras Estates Land Act which has since been repealed by the Amendment Act of 1934. Under Section 46(5) the sum payable in respect of "old waste" for the acquisition of occupancy right had to be paid to the land-holder " who is the owner of the estate."
Madras High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1