cites: 148836369

Lalit Kumar Jain vs Union Of India on 21 May, 2021

17. Similarly, Respondent Nos. 2 to 6 filed Written Submission along with judgments: Gourshanakr Jain v. Punjab National Bank12, State Bank of India v. V. Ramakrishnan13, Lalit Kumar Jain v. Union of India14

Supreme Court of India Cites 183 - Cited by 17 - S R Bhat - Full Document

Section 146 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 72

State Bank Of India vs V. Ramakrishnan on 14 August, 2018

17. Similarly, Respondent Nos. 2 to 6 filed Written Submission along with judgments: Gourshanakr Jain v. Punjab National Bank12, State Bank of India v. V. Ramakrishnan13, Lalit Kumar Jain v. Union of India14

Supreme Court of India Cites 73 - Cited by 80 - R F Nariman - Full Document

Ram Kishun And 6 Others vs State Of U.P. And 8 Others on 18 March, 2021

Therefore, by applying lead judgments of "State Bank of India vs. V. Ramakrishnan" and "Lalit Kr. Jain vs. Union of India", we are unable to accept the contention of the Appellants since learned Adjudicating Authority rightly relied on "Ram Kishun & Ors v. State of U.P. and others", Calcutta High Court decision in "Gouri Shankar Jain Vs. Punjab National Bank" reiterating the same principle and decided the point, and the findings recorded by the Adjudicating Authority are free from any legal infirmities warranting no interference by this Appellate Tribunal. Hence, the finding of the Adjudicating Authority is hereby affirmed by holding the point against the Appellants and in favour of the Respondents.

Allahabad High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 7 - Full Document